Leaders provide direction and control to the organisation in different ways.
This is a site for interaction with KM and Productivity practitioners and to promote the "uncommon Common Sense"
Leaders provide direction and control to the organisation in different ways.
First CKO : Our KM efforts through social net-working is not producing any results.
Most of us do not remember the events of the past as the human memory forgets the knowledge that is not in active use. But then such knowledge is not permanently lost. It is possible to recollect the forgotten events through memory flashes, both voluntary and non-voluntary.
Both forgetting and remembering are arms of the learning process. In forgetting, we unlearn what is not important and in remembering, we relearn what is required at the instant times.
In the KM process, there would be requirements of “Forgetting to Remember” and “Remembering to Forget” situations.
For example, one should ‘forget’ to remember the normal organisational tendency to look for magical shortcuts like “Technology Implosion” trying to substitute “Culture of Trust”. And ‘remember’ to forget the tendency to look for magical outcomes like huge profitability before a deep rooted KM culture.
As I peeked out of my balcony on the lazy Sunday morning into the opposite park, I observed that the crows suddenly started to make peculiar sounds “Caw – Caw”. Joining with them were the mynahs with their typical cooing sound, the sparrows with their shrieking and the squirrels on the trees humming loudly. I was curious to look for the sudden development that made all these creatures to create a joint chorus on a lazy morning. There – a Cat was slowly emerging from a nearby bush and looking for any sleepy prey.
While we, the human beings, the learned and the intelligent living species, seem to have forgotten a fundamental strategy, the lesser beings like the birds continue to exercise the collaborative spirits with their competitors against a common enemy.
Nature has taught us to compete to remain fit for survival. So we have developed organizations that try to outsmart each other and beat them at the market place. Productivity and KM are some of the tools used by the organizations to grow themselves and beat the competition. Competitiveness has become the catchword in the globalised businosphere.
However, the recent global crises like the economic recession, terrorism and environmental disasters, provide us ample warning that all competing organizations also need to cooperate against common dangers or else the productivity of the humanity as a whole would go down to the detriment of the entire human society.
The “Total Ban on Smoking in all Public Places” would be joining the long list of already existing bans in the country, child marriage, child labour, littering in public places, consumption of alcohol in some states, photography in restricted(?) places, bandhs, domestic violence, spitting, adulteration, temple entry for some religions and castes, only to name a few. Our parliamentary committee is presently in serious debate for a ban on use of mobile phones in “specific vulnerable” places like educational institutions, religious places, hospitals and crematoriums (?).
While it is clear like sunshine on a hot day, that none of the existing bans has been effective due to abysmal enforcements and user ignorance, there are intensive arguments going on in the media for and against the proposed ban on Smoking. Tobacco companies are contesting the ban in the courts citing reasons like “individual freedom” and you guessed it – “loss of productivity to the tobacco farmers”.
The conflict between “Freedom” and “Control” is as old as the humanity itself. While “Knowledge” is free and all pervading, it needs to be regulated, controlled and selectively absorbed if we have to make productive gains for the society. However, such “controls” are possible only through the “freedom” to mould the control process suiting to the spirits of the individuals. There is an old Tamil Song which sounds like this - “ Theft can not be eliminated till the time thieves themselves repent and stop stealing”.
Let us hope that the bans for the good causes kindles the spirit of freedom in individuals to espouse those causes.
Change Management is understood in different contexts depending upon the situation. One such context is the requirement for totally different skills and competencies to be acquired within a relatively short time. Many organisations have recently embarked on an ‘Outsourcing’ spree in order to restrict their operations to their ‘Core Competence’. Now doing things yourselves and getting them done through outsourcing require completely different competencies.
For example, a teacher in a school is very adept in teaching his favourite subject to the students, and now suddenly he is expected to get the teaching process outsourced to an e-learning service provider. We can visualise the new competencies he has to now develop in order to successfully manage the outsourcing- IT literacy, Content management, online and offline tracking of student performance, Hardware- Softrware Maintenance, Supervision of services, Payments management – only to name a few new competencies he has to acquire for Change Management.
Not surprisingly, in many situations, people fail to cope up with daunting tasks of acquiring new competencies resulting in the failure of the initiative. Outsourcing as a component of KM/Productivity initiatives needs to be done on a very careful manner to prevent such burn outs.
“All Knowledgeable people are not successful; and not all successful people are knowledgeable” – so goes a famous old tamil song.
Success – the sought after result by everyone, however, is a subjective phenomena; In financial world, the achievement of profit may be considered as 'success', however it is conditioned by the means and methods adopted. In organisations, promotions to next levels of hierarchy may be the 'success', but we also know that some people rise to the highest level of incompetence. In sports, everyone who participates is considered 'successful' as the spirit is respected and not the position achieved. In life, achieving all material benefits may seem to be the 'success', but these ultimately may not allow us to realise our self which is considered to be 'ultimate success'.
So the old tamil song may have to be rewritten “ All knowledgeable people are successful; they are successful in knowing what is the real success factor in their knowledge process”
Five years ago, the government was declaring its success with “India Shining” campaign. The inflation was under control and economy was having around 8 % GDP growth. It looked at that time that “Knowledge” oriented service sector productivity which had been the new focus for the country would compensate for any shortcomings of “Material” oriented agriculture and manufacturing sector productivity. The only eyesore was that farmers were committing suicide in scores due to distress as their farm productivity plummeted and they were led to debt traps.
Five years down the line, the government is declaring that it is more caring for common human beings. However, while the problems of farmers’ suicide have not totally been solved, we get the news that two brokers have committed suicide due to the recent financial sector crisis. There is also apprehension raised now in many quarters about the impending productivity loss of financial sectors on a global scale to cause heavy distress. There is temporary relief that the Governments have come to the aid of failing institutions all over the world, as it was done earlier for the farmers with Loan Waiver, it is well known that inherent productivity weaknesses cannot be compensated with external makeovers.
The moral of the above distressed process from farmers to brokers, is that “Knowledge” and “Productivity” would help to sustain and grow only when our needs and actions are limited within justified and controlled paradigms. If we are to cross that “Lakshman Rekha” to cater to speculative and greedy desires, the same process that provided us with growth and wealth is capable of destructive and distressful blow to all of us.
In the Japanese Manufacturing assembly lines, one of the practices to bring “Kaizen” improvements is to deliberately introduce instabilities. For example, if an assembly process is evaluated through time / method studies to be normally operated by six people, what would be our normal approach ? We would deploy seven people so that one person is available to take care of contingent deployments. But in "Kaizen" approaches, the opposite is done. If an assembly line deploys six people and operates in a normal manner, a deliberate attempt to reduce the number to five is made. What do you think will be the result? Mistakes, overloads and reduction in productivity? No! With a positive mindset, it is possible to induce innovative spirits within the human mind when he is in new paradigms. The "Kaizen" experiments have proved that the careful reduction of people beyond the norms in the assembly lines result in higher productivity rather than reduction.
The above example illustrates that for “innovation” to happen, one has to physically move the target innovators to the edge or boundaries of the existing systems. If they can be moved even out of the boundaries, still better. At the least they should be taken to the boundary levels or to the edge. The shifting to the boundary state creates an unstable paradigm where the conventional rules / standards / processes / procedures etc begin to transform and become interpretable and amenable for innumerable variations. Thus from this transformation arises new innovations that could not have been thought of in the stable atmospheres of the core of the existing systems.
An example - Mahatma Gandhi was thrown out of the boundaries of normal human behavioral standards in South Africa where he was refused a seat in the First Class of the train; thus began the new innovation of “Satyagraha Struggle” that eventually led to the liberation of India to freedom.
Knowledge is omni present and is everywhere; then why is it that we don’t get the knowledge we are desperately looking for that easily.
Let us look for an analogy in the world. The earth is covered three fourths by water of the oceans. The human body’s most important requirement is water as the major proportion of 80 percent of the human body is comprised made of water. However the transformation of water from the oceans to the human body has to take a very long and arduous route of cleaning, filtration, purification and internalization through a natural process that has been evolved over millions of years.
If water which is in material form takes so long an arduous path, imagine the journey the knowledge, which is in energy form, require to get transformed from omnipresence to individual’s repository through the intellect, mind and then the soul. It would be much more time and efforts’ consuming.
There is however a difference between the cycles of water and cycles of knowledge; the water does not change its fundamental physical and chemical form of existence in its continuous process cycles and has remained the same for billions of years. However I believe that Knowledge continues to grow and expand with ever increasing entropy, in its process of formation, travel, absorption and transformation over the long periods of times of evolution of this universe. And hence the much more difficulty in getting the right knowledge that we are looking for.
Thank you Operation BAD
For it was’nt worse than bad
For reminding we are unprepared
Despite being forewarned
For our culture of easy stride
Blaming always the god
Tired of terrors repeated
There’s however some good
To see us all united
In times when we’re distressed
Hoping to look for future that’s kind
Let’s change terror to concern for the world.
(The CKO’s conversation series has been a convenient way of conveying humor in my posts. I propose to continue with the same. Here is one more piece.)
CKO 1 : We conducted an experiment in our company to transfer the knowledge and skills from the best of our brainy chaps to the dumb guys.
CKO 2 : How did you do it ?
CKO 1 : We closeted the brainy chaps and the dumbards in the specially made Knowledge Lab for one month so that the knowledge transformation can take place exclusively.
CKO 2 : And then ?
CKO 1 : We ended up having a group of Dumbards and another group of Nuts.
We are aware of the phenomenon known as “Placebo Effect” in cure of illnesses where the ‘faith’ transforms apparently useless molecules of medicines to be converted into healers and curers. The exact mechanism of this effect is still to be unraveled.
I feel there is a similar ‘Placebo Effect’ in Knowledge Sharing where apparently useless information through the process of faith and devotion gets automatically converted into very useful Knowledge. This effect can be illustrated as an example in “Mantra Yoga” where just syllables and semantics when repeated number of times with faith and devotion can lead to emancipation of the practitioner.
I had this opportunity to conduct the KM awareness programme at Bharat Electronics Ltd (BEL) at
The core learning from the programme was to see that even well developed and advanced organisations like BEL have their employees not yet exposed to topics like Knowledge Economy and KM. Hence what we discussed as KM features were well received with enthusiasm and a sense of expectation to carry forward the technique, in anticipation of the forthcoming KM demonstration project with them.
One highlight of the discussions, I felt that the method of “Story Telling” to transfer knowledge, with the example of the story of Dr.Abdul Kalam narrating the story about his superior Satish Dhawan as to the qualities of Leader who supports when the subordinate has hard times and gives credit during successful times, was well received.
I feel that Leadership is an important KM factor, and the crux, in the Indian situations to decide the success or failure of KM attempts. Leaders should develop the habit of Story Telling to connect and relate with his people so that they are able to convey the message that can be easily understood by the people below.
A successful KM effort would be to inculcate intrapreneurial capabilities within the workforce. In traditional bureaucracy based organisations, particularly in the Government Sector, employees are traditionally expected to follow orders, rules and procedures. Anything done outside these are considered to be indiscipline and against the organisations’ interest. The result of such behaviour is that the workforce will be afraid to put in their best.
In the ‘learning organisation’ mode, the work force are motivated to bring out and test their innovative ideas, even if that means, a risk taking for the company. In fact the firm is ready to invest substantial amounts as venture capital to experiment with the innovative ideas of the people, only to look towards the promised returns for the new ventures that can be established from these ventures. The organisation is also ready to share the profits out of the ventures substantially by making the concerned employee the incharge for the project.
The examples of many Indian organisations who are changing over intrapreneurial methods fostering KM are increasingly getting reported. Slowly this idea may catch up with the Government sectors as well.
Children can be the source of most innovative ideas. Whenever you are breaking your head / brain to find a solution to the most difficult and complex problems, try taking the help of a child. I am not joking! The younger the child, the chances of getting a unique and innovative solution is the brightest. Children are blessed with the wisdom which is not masked by the uncommon sense that forms over the thinking of the elders. Listen to the following story for confirmation.
"While sailing in a rough sea, the captain of a ship suddenly found a sea mine floating very near to the ship that could explode if it contacts any steel surface. He alerted the crowd on the deck and asked for suggestion to push the mine away from the ship. A child remarked 'Let us all blow from our mouth to push the mine away'. The idea helped the captain to commission the fire hose to blow a strong water jet to push the mine away".
Productivity looks for an opportunity to do things better even under the most arduous circumstances. Even Disasters are learning lessons if we look at it from Productivity point of view.
No doubt that the recent devastating floods in
Of course the roles of Government and the Societal organizations in making the above improvements towards productivity for future is very important; let our leaders and opinion makers unite and strive to achieve better future for all of us and avert disasters.
If we can visualise the infinite variations in the nature, attitude, culture, habits, language, expectations, values etc etc in humans, it would be obvious to us to understand the existence of work place politics in almost all organisations. Even the best of Knowledge Enterprises cannot escape from the human nature of its workforce to indulge in workplace politics.
There are two sides of the workplace politics’ coin. The fair side is that people of the same feather flock together and thus it is natural for them to work together as well. Thus team formation is facilitated and the various teams would be able to contribute in an informal way, but the most effective manner. Such formations may transgress the established hierarchy, but the natural affinity of the people aligning together compensates for the distorted communication flows. A productivity / KM initiative which can take advantage of such cultural alignments through workplace politics will produce good results.
However, one has to be careful about the flip of the side of the coin as well. If the groups who are aligned separately try to outsmart each other by indulging in counter destruction, then the cumulative effect would be enormous loss of productivity for the organisation. There are many situations where people and the groups have strong memory imprints of their past and refusing to unlearn, can pose hurdles to any improvement initiative even in an unconscious manner. Any KM / Productivity initiative in such a situation will need a strong aligning force outside of the system to sort out the mindset differences and unify the culture.